Are you a bad person too?

The true unpopular opinion?

People who are not misandrists?

Tho, I think your comment shows that you are a misandrist, with how you are trying to justify, downplay and even lowkey promoting it.

Anyway, not going to argue much about it here, since you seem to a misandrists who calls anyone who disagrees with your pov as a misogynist

Isn’t the meme misandrist?

What would the steps be for that?

I’m not USAmerican, so I don’t know much of the base level stuff there. I think they have a green party or so. But are they a good/distinct enough choice?

True

May some actually believed it would be a positive choice?

Like, you guys only have two major choices, right? What else can you electorally rather than alternate between them, if you find one lacking. Or you could try to build/back a third party, but when the current status quo is based on the two party system, you mau have to wait for sometime to wait for the 3rd one to grow.

Is IQ a legit measure?

For a USAmerican(or any other person), their primary concern would be their own safety, right?

Unless they can form/support a major third party, they are effectively forced to a two-choice system

Thank you

Find the best available option? Or start your own server with no rules and attract others who want no rules?

I think a good community would have restrictions to avoid unnecessary hate

I think most of my friends and even acquaintances would rush me to a hospital.
I think more than 50% of the people I know would do that.

Regarding genuinely good and trusting my life, that would would be smaller.

A question on the other view tho:
Would you(not OP only) be that genuinely good person for someone? As a guess, in your view how many people would see you like that?

I think only my family and maybe close friends would see me like that.

Regarding getting people to a hospital, I think the 50% stuff would apply to me too.

Aah.
Is there something like the automod feature in reddit?
That would be solution to common misconceptions, right?

Aah. Sorry.
I was a bit wary since I got banned in a .world community when I shared similar pov’s. I think there are some who equate Stalin to Hitler, so was trying to avoid needless fights on that.

I’m in the KL state.

Famines are never going to be pretty, right?
I have seen pictures online of the Bengal and Mangalore famines that India suffered under British rule.

My doubt on it is how much of it is natural and how much is intentional.
What do those historians say about that?

I have seen people arguing and discussing about it online, with everything ranging from intentional punishment to bureaucratic inefficiency to feudal farmlords burning their produce and animals during the famine to how famines were common in the region until the 1950’s and also mentions of grain export

Also, which part of India, if you don’t mind?

Southern India
Are you Indian too? Which part?

Overall positive.

I’ve heard that he supported the development of India. As an Indian, positive view here.

After joining lemmy, seeing arguments about him, got to know that he faced personal losses too, with his son, a soldier in the WW2, dying in a Nazi concentration camp as a PoW.

Have read that there were purges of officials and repression in fear of Nazi and other spies and that excesses did happen under his govt.
But considering how they were able to reduce poverty and were able to industrialise their nation, making them able to fight the Nazis, I see them overall positively.

Have heard about the famine too. But not sure if it was purposeful like how Churchill took away foodgrains from Bengal. So negative view on it, but not sure how to see it. Whether it is intentional or natural cause or inefficiency.

How do you feel about Hitler?

Isn’t lemmy.world very very USA-centric? And they are keen on name calling you as a tankie if you mention things that do not go along with their view.

I was banned from a community there, because I mentioned the Munich agreement and shared my view opposing what the community had in a discussion that centred around the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.

Time to make accounts in lemmy.ml

I don’t think they are that dogmatic too.
Like, they seem to support China lead by a Socialist/Communist/Marxist political leadership, that declares its aim as transitioning into socialism by 2050 or so.

Is ‘Wet behind the ears’ a comparison to a newborn baby?