I would agree about getting buying the cheaper version, if it doesn’t also might mean buying an EOL product.

If Nintendo stops providing updates and new games of the old switch (soonish) then (what I suspect from console gaming) then suggesting to buy the old product from Nindendo looks like they just want to empty their Switch 1 stockpile.

If Nintendo just treats the Switch 1 and 2 as the same console, with just different performance and price, but get the same support period and games, then I am fully with you.

Am I the only one that thinks PoE stands for Pillars of Eternity (and Power over Ethernet) and gets confused?

Reparability? Robustness? Software support? Community support?

It isn’t all about comparing performance numbers.

I really hate most subscriptions, because the prices are often too high, they rely on locking stuff behind paywalls, instead of providing a good service.

Here is the difference, I am ok paying monthly for storage space, servers, and hosted/managed open source web services, because there is competition and standard interfaces there. They do not hold you (or your data) hostage to their service, what they provide is good on its own.

For example, if GOG invests money into writing open source libraries, apps and APIs to efficiently and easily share save games between devices. Let people self host the open source backend, but offer up a subscription for a managed instance, with maybe some voting rights for new features or support for games/platforms to be integrated into the open source front & backend, then I would be willing to support this.

And other stuff like this.

Use subscriptions to offer good services, which also allow you to improve the whole ecosystem, while also not putting yourself as the gatekeeper, and locking people into their service.

When the debate revolved around Emacs vs. Vim, I used Spacemacs. It seem we moved on from that?

Is it now about VScode vs. (Neo)Vim?

Guess that means Vim won the Emacs vs. Vim debate then, when it got into the next round.