Dangerous times that could lead to war. Philippines or South/Central America.

I don’t know China to be corrupt.

Oligarchist corruption specifically privatizes profits for social losses. Destroying/diminishing country is a sacrifice they are willing to make. But sure, bribery for foreign imperialist privatization is just as bad.

Right way to measure governments is oligarchist corruption. All CIA approved democracies fail at this, and so not in the slightest a beneficial model. Trade shouldn’t be viewed as bad. Corruption and subjugation are bad, and trade deals should be looked at only under that framework.

There will be more empty shelves and inflation in US than in China.

Every piece of land can be useful. US’s current friendship with/lordship over NATO would get any project it wants done, and allow any shipments/trade routes to/from America. Project value is overblown due to high development costs and distance to markets.

The reason you will hear economics and defense from enemies motives, is that is the sweetest sounding lie. It would increase the purchase price if Denmark citizens knew that Denmark government and its king are selling to US to improve its capabilities to murder all Danes.

Too many DEI women hires, obviously.

Japan and South Korea are seeking to import semiconductor raw materials from China, and China is also interested in purchasing chip products from Japan and South Korea

Canada and Europe have responded to US attacks with more division from China instead. Need more unity with world instead of cowering individually. Too many CIA assets in top political positions.

Too bad about solar and steel. But countries should stip looking at global warming as esg marketing for nationalist production, and just go with cheapest tech leaders. Including welcoming their fdi for local plants.

The agenda items being reported, seem to talk down china, and so effectively a continuance of Biden foreign policy demands.

Not likely to provide any rapprochement. But talking is step 1.

Its too easy to dismiss reality as russian propaganda, and that’s what has made the war so easy.

Your statement simply means the war can’t be allowed to end until greater losses are suffered.

While obvious there is no ukrainian eu desire for peace, Russia should still offer a ceasefire with significant expansion of front lines.

Gifting zaporishia nuclear plant to us is dumb for both russia and ukraine, but russia should promise same low rate to both sides and 50% power output.

Peace means a return to 2013 laws in Ukraine. Future referendums on nationality of oblasts is a good security guarantee for humanist attitudes from both west and Russia.

Main message is: “Talk to Russia. Dangerous to be US’s friend. US is the one that feeds you Russophobia propaganda, and embarked you into the Ukraine adventure”.

Headlines from Europe after today’s white house drama is “We will always love Ukraine, and hate Russia”

Hmmm… I wonder who can sell weapons if Europe goes to war with Russia? It takes a special level of brain worm to follow up supporting the sabotage of your pipelines, to responding to economic coercion and military abandonment by also clinging to war on your new enemy’s traditional enemy.

US is giving EU/NATO an opportunity for freedom. Doing the CIA’s wettest dream is the opposite of waking up.

what would Europe need from russia?

Resources is big one, including infrastructure already in place for energy. Most of the world sides with Russia through this conflict. Even some US colonies have done well playing both sides. Russia is also an export market. World needs Russia to limit global warming. Futile attempts to destroy it, won’t work.

Russophobia has been the big disease, really created by US/USAID/NED/CIA. Europe seems to need a moment to let go, but if US isn’t forcing them into it, the rest of the world has already been open to Russia and China. Trump is literally forcing the world to liberate itself from US. The US is still a nice market, but China is much larger to sell into, and tariff wars are not likely to bring investments into the US.

A multipolar world makes as much obvious sense as democracy. But it is pretty remarkable that US is pushing for it now.

There is one and only one reason Trump/US wants Greenland. With US out of NATO, it is a point closer to Europe to threaten Europe. Every other explanation is a disgusting lie, and of zero value to US.